On the National Alliance, you asked, my view is that I do not see a deal in this movement, not a national one, because the agreement is a policy in which the factions blend together and create a wide-ranging power.
But in this particular example, we don’t see this, because a few friends are sitting together and advised that you, you, introduce yourself to different organizations with different names, and then we come together under several schemes or the National Covenant of Tajikistan.
So changing that name or getting that scam name won’t change anything, so it’s neither a deal here nor a national one. But what nationality means in the language, or in the general sense of nationalism, is the scale of one movement, and there is no scale that, as we say, is a movement, it is a national movement, or values represent a movement.
From the standpoint of values, we see that, especially in its leadership and its followers, there are very few extremist groups and groups, and there are a number of liberal tendencies outside of national consciousness, so the Tajik national position is not so prominent here. It is therefore neither national nor national in terms of value.
This is a very important point, but if I say then what I see is that I think this project has two main features, one that is a commercial project, because in the case of migration, the opposition party’s leaders have come to the conclusion that Each member of the group has a different name, each of its active members is a mechanism for obtaining grants, to receive funds from different international organizations, from different countries.
This is a business matter, so it may be said that the design is a business design, but from the intellectual and spiritual point of view, the creation of the National Alliance is the ultimate subject of the Islamic Renaissance Party. Because the Islamic Renaissance Party has long been out of the question, but politically and informally it still kept this party in the information space, but with the establishment of the National Covenant, you see, there has been no name in the last year.
We can say that the leadership of the National Alliance has historically handed over the Islamic Revival Party to itself, saying that the National Covenant is a kind of mazar on the part of the Islamic Renaissance Party, as they have done so for the international community. Europeans also know the essence of this party, know the party’s history, the extremist views revealed during this activity, and the crimes committed in the world.
So no one is ready to fund, support, or sponsor a party called the party, or give it a shelter, or give it an area of activity in these countries, so they don’t go out of favor. came and presented a whole new brand with a new look – one side, and finally, if I think that geopolitics has a big impact here as well, to support such movements, to help develop such movements. component of interests of interested countries in Our region is in Central Asia in Tajikistan, and it is a national pact and organizations like that, which are built here in different countries than in any other country, in fact will be a tool for the implementation of foreign interests in the region and in Tajikistan.
Therefore, there is no definition of what this organization or organization has or what authority it has, it has no power, no patents.
If there is a patent, if it is the power of the owners or owners, who can raise this child by their own power, or make their own design, or collect their own design, if necessary.
As the Taliban grows up, they grow smaller, bigger and smaller, and they depend on demand. So there is nothing to be proud of if this movement is supported by even greater foreign support. Because it is a reflection of the realities and aspirations, national values and interests that means being proud of a foreign hand, growing up with a foreigner or becoming a strongman is nothing to be proud of.
And I think that if our citizens today want to be really connected to the National Covenant, the National Covenant is in Tajikistan today, it’s a great creative movement, that stable national unity when our national unity is no longer with the withdrawal of one party. expulsion of one movement or one person does not change and remains stable.
This is our national agreement, our national commitment is to Rogun and it is a great deed that our nation, the head of our state demonstrated in Rogun, and it has won a victory.
Leave a Reply